🔗 Share this article

T relief resulting from the halt in hostilities in Gaza is immense. In Israel, the freeing of captives held alive has led to widespread elation. In Gaza and the West Bank, celebrations are taking place as up to 2,000 Palestinian prisoners start to be released – although anguish remains due to doubt about the identities of those released and their eventual placements. Throughout Gaza's northern regions, residents can at last return to sift through wreckage for the remains of an approximated 10,000 unaccounted-for individuals.

Peace Breakthrough Despite Earlier Odds

Only three weeks ago, the likelihood of a ceasefire appeared remote. However it has been implemented, and on Monday Donald Trump travelled from Jerusalem, where he was hailed in the Knesset, to Sharm el-Sheikh in Egypt. There, he joined a high-level diplomatic gathering of in excess of 20 world leaders, including Sir Keir Starmer. The plan for peace begun there is scheduled to proceed at a meeting in the UK. The US president, acting with international partners, successfully brokered this deal take place – contrary to, not because of, Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Aspirations for Sovereignty Tempered by Previous Experiences

Hopes that the deal signifies the opening phase toward Palestinian statehood are comprehensible – but, considering past occurrences, slightly idealistic. It offers no clear path to independence for Palestinians and risks dividing, for the foreseeable future, Gaza from the West Bank. Furthermore the total ruin this war has produced. The lack of any timeline for Palestinian autonomy in the US initiative undermines boastful allusions, in his Knesset speech, to the “monumental start” of a “era of prosperity”.

Donald Trump was unable to refrain from dividing and individualizing the deal in his speech.

In a time of respite – with the hostage release, ceasefire and resumption of aid – he decided to reinterpret it as a ethical drama in which he solely reinstated Israel’s prestige after alleged treachery by previous American leaders Obama and Biden. Notwithstanding the Biden administration twelve months prior having undertaken a analogous arrangement: a ceasefire connected with relief entry and ultimate diplomatic discussions.

Meaningful Agency Crucial for Authentic Resolution

A plan that denies one side genuine autonomy cannot produce legitimate peace. The ceasefire and aid trucks are to be embraced. But this is still not policy development. Without systems securing Palestinian engagement and command over their own establishments, any deal risks freezing subjugation under the rhetoric of peace.

Humanitarian Priorities and Recovery Hurdles

Gaza’s people desperately need relief assistance – and sustenance and pharmaceuticals must be the primary focus. But restoration must not be delayed. Amid 60 million tonnes of rubble, Palestinians need help repairing homes, schools, healthcare facilities, mosques and other institutions devastated by Israel’s invasion. For Gaza’s provisional leadership to succeed, monetary resources must arrive promptly and security gaps be remedied.

Comparable with a large portion of the president's diplomatic proposal, mentions to an global peacekeeping unit and a suggested “board of peace” are alarmingly vague.

International Support and Future Prospects

Robust international support for the Palestinian Authority, permitting it to take over from Hamas, is probably the most hopeful possibility. The tremendous pain of the past two years means the ethical argument for a resolution to the conflict is possibly more critical than ever. But even as the ceasefire, the return of the captives and commitment by Hamas to “disarm” Gaza should be acknowledged as favorable developments, the president's history offers minimal cause to believe he will fulfill – or deem himself compelled to try. Immediate respite should not be interpreted as that the prospect of a Palestinian state has been moved nearer.